Jeremy ([info]frogman1975) wrote,
@ 2005-08-31 11:30:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: cynical
Current music:Outkast "Bombs over Baghdad"

Administration to open strategic oil reserves
Full story at http://money.cnn.com/2005/08/30/news/economy/katrina_cost/index.htm

I remember well over a year ago when Congressman Ted Strickland (D-Oh) was telling me that he and other Reps were petitioning the White House to open these reserves to try and bring oil prices back into check (this was right after we first broke the $2 per gallon mark)
Now we are opening them up, and that is good. Otherwise gas prices, which are estimated to eventually hit over $4 per gallon, would shoot through the roof immediately.
But what is funny to me is that the administration was NOT willing to open these reserves to help bring down gas prices for the average working man and woman. However when gulf coast oil producers are fearful that they might experience some profit losses, the administration opens the reserves without delay.
Again, I'm not criticizing the current regime, errrr, I mean administration, for opening these reserves during this time of emergency.
But this does demonstrate where the Bush administration's loyalties and sympathies lie. They don't give a damn for the working class that they duped into electing them. They do care about some profit losses for their oil company friends.




(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]elph8
2005-08-31 11:31 am UTC (link)
They absolutely SHOULD NOT open the strategic oil reserves. Those aren't there to save us a few bucks but to protect us in the event of a disaster. Katrina doesn't even come close to qualifying.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]frogman1975
2005-08-31 12:11 pm UTC (link)
Opening up a little will NOT hurt. Presidents have routinely opened up the reserves when prices become artificially inflated.

Anyway, we really shouldn't even be arguing about whether or not they should be opened but should take ALL of these different factors (the arguing over what to do with the reserves, the projected $4 per gallon prices, the OPEC Nations ability to artificially inflate prices by halting production, etc.) as signs that it is REALLY time to get our asses in gear and seriously consider alternative fuels.
I mean, how about more ethanol or other vegetable based fuels? Instead of paying farmers to leave their fields fallow, how about encouraging them to grow more crops that can be converted into fuel and create more US jobs running said bio-fuel factories?
But, I disagree with you on the reserves because they have been tapped a little and resupplied many times over. GW was using that "need them for a national emergency" excuse when Strickland and other Dems first brought it up.

But the real point of this post was, whether you feel like they should be opened or not, G-Dub has no qualms about opening these emergency reserves when the emergency is the corporate bottom line of oil companies, but to hell with the working folks driving back and forth to jobs at those companies everyday.

Ya feeling me?

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Also
[info]frogman1975
2005-08-31 12:33 pm UTC (link)
did a little quick snooping to make sure I was correct in my assumptions about the purpose of the SPR.
They are there for "economic emergencies."
Now these might be related to other emergencies (hurricanes, war, terrorist attacks, etc.), but in my opinion, when people are choosing between food and gas because they need to get back and forth to work, that is a national emergency.
I'm a little bit of a socialist though.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-09-01 02:52 pm UTC (link)
Soo, this isn't a disaster !

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Not as big of a disaster as the smoking ban
[info]frogman1975
2005-09-01 03:04 pm UTC (link)
Now THERE is a disaster. What will all the nicotine fiends do now!!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2005-09-03 01:07 am UTC (link)
If the oil reserves would have been opened well over a year ago what would the status of the reserve be now? Answer: we would have a smaller reserve and less capability to deal with a disaster/emergency.

The reserves should only be used to deal with temporary problems. Problems with an end in sight. Katrina is such a case. Oil production and refining in the Gulf have been reduced due to the storm. As the oil platforms and refineries come back online, production will return to normal and we can undertake the process of replenishing our reserves.

Prices going above $2 a year ago were caused by greater worldwide demand for oil. With the economies of China and India increasing their dependence on oil this problem has no end in the near future.

As for the assertion that the President is opening the reserves to boost oil company profits...I would like to know your reasoning for that accusation. The government uses the reserves to sell more oil on the open market, thus lowering prices. The profits from the sales go into a fund to support resupplying the reserves a later time. They don't just give the oil to large oil companies and let them keep the profits.

More information on the reserves
http://www.fe.doe.gov/programs/reserves/

(Reply to this) (Thread)

over 700 million barrels
[info]frogman1975
2005-09-03 08:26 am UTC (link)
is a LOT of oil.
Plus, like you said, anything that is taken out is supposed to be replaced later by the company it goes too.
Yes, the companies who are taking oil now will have to replace it. As would any oil taken out before when Strickland and other Dems were suggesting opening the reserves.
And if they aren't being opened to protect oil companies that are losing profits due to lost production in the Gulf, well then I must have been reading different newspapers than you Mr. or Mrs. Anonymous.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

And yeah...
[info]frogman1975
2005-09-03 08:33 am UTC (link)
I link to that same DOE in ANOTHER post too. It explains how often the reserves have been tapped and resupplied AND that the reserves are there for economic emergencies.
I'm not going to apologize for thinking this administration cares only about oil profits, because I think that was proved when they ignored the threat of Bin Laden to go into Iraq and "secure the oil fields" and when they say we can't pull out because then we would be "giving the oil resources to the terrorist"
Sorry, but I DON'T trust our president.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…